It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:27 am



Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
 There's MimeJr. , so why not KangasJr. ???? 

How 'bout it?
YES!! - Give kangaskhan a pre-evolution 93%  93%  [ 27 ]
NO!!! - This is lame 7%  7%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 29

 There's MimeJr. , so why not KangasJr. ???? 
Author Message
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:17 am
Posts: 360
Location: Somewhere between Life and Afterlife
OK we've all seen the baby Kangaskhan in the pouch, but when you breed one, and adult hatches out of the egg with... another baby in it's puch!

When is Nintendo going to make Kangaskhan make sense?

{kangaskhan} :arrow: It's been there since Pokemon was created! When is it going to be an official pokemon!?!?!?!

(yes this is the 2nd kangaskhan topic I've posted in 2 days... I've got a problem, man...)

_________________
All governments want you to be stupid so that you're easier to control.
{unown} {unown n} {unown} {unown r} {unown c} {unown h} {unown y}

Image


Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:13 pm
Profile WWW
Dragon Tamer
Dragon Tamer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:38 am
Posts: 117
Location: Lawn-Giyland New Yawk hon! Want some kawfee?
Post 
Yeah, that'd make a lot more sense. Plus, a baby Kangaskhan would be cute. Yay Kangaskhan!

_________________
so i here u leik mudkipz...


Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:24 pm
Profile
Trivia Champion
Trivia Champion
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:37 pm
Posts: 3170
Location: clegavel
Post 
Good - I'm not the only one that thinks this.
Yes, it makes no sense that a newly hatched Kangaskhan automatically has a baby in its pouch. It should have the pre-evo first, and then grow larger later.
But even so, is there even need for an egg? The baby in the pouch is very much alive and well to me.
Yet another example of why certain things in video games don't make sense.

- DNA

_________________


Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:19 pm
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 3:43 am
Posts: 396
Location: UK
Post 
Should be a baby pre-evolution and a parallel male evolution... that way they can keep the orginal idea of a kangaskhan... but make a bit more sense from it...

OR

They could have an evolution of kangaskhan, but if you have a spare slot then you get a baby (which may or may not evolve into kangaskhan...)

_________________
Yes, I used to have a shop; no, I'm not still doing it. (Unless you can give me a good reason...)


Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:33 pm
Profile
Dragon Tamer
Dragon Tamer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:05 am
Posts: 199
Location: Indonesia
Post 
But if they create the evolution of {kangaskhan}, it would be wierd. {kangaskhan} is actually a 2 pokemon fused together, so if they create the evolution of it, there would be 3 {kangaskhan}s. A baby kangashkan should make sense.

_________________
"Devotion, Determination, and Dedication is just what a leader requires."

-psynvrn, 2008

Image


Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:43 am
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:48 am
Posts: 292
Location: Tuesdays is applesauce days!
Post 
A baby Kangaskhan makes perfect sense because the mother is always carrying around the baby in it's pouch so you'd think they'd make a pre-evoloution to kangaskhan but no. Nintendo makes no sense these days. Plus baby kangaskhans are super cute!


Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:03 am
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:17 am
Posts: 360
Location: Somewhere between Life and Afterlife
Post 
Yay! Positive feedback!

It's great to know there are so many like-minded Pokemon players. It just makes so many things so easy to explain.

Thanks to everyone who dropped their opinion in.

_________________
All governments want you to be stupid so that you're easier to control.
{unown} {unown n} {unown} {unown r} {unown c} {unown h} {unown y}

Image


Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:35 pm
Profile WWW
Dragon Tamer
Dragon Tamer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:12 am
Posts: 156
Location: thankz to pikachu420, HTP, solidraiden, and zombie for the sprites
Post 
yay a prevolution! i am 100% for that.

_________________
Image Image Image Image


Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:41 pm
Profile
Pokemon Master
Pokemon Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 1152
Location: IN THE EMOTIONLESS TRAWLING FERVOR'S OF MY INSANE MIND.
Post 
Maybe the baby isn't a baby at alll, maybe it's part of a kangesgan's body 0.0!!! Maybe she uses it a scapegoat.

ZOMG IZ A CONPERSY THEERIST!!!


Nintendo doesn't do a lot of things it should......

_________________
ImageImage
^DarkCosmos, Poems^


Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:52 am
Profile
Pokemon Master
Pokemon Master
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:59 pm
Posts: 2399
Location: feel the mambo
Post 
They'll say "No, that's actually a part of Kangashkan. Instead, we're gonna make a MEGAKANGA!!!!"

since they did that with electrabuzz. :(

_________________
gone.


Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:53 pm
Profile WWW
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:17 am
Posts: 360
Location: Somewhere between Life and Afterlife
Post 
Valentine wrote:
They'll say "No, that's actually a part of Kangashkan. Instead, we're gonna make a MEGAKANGA!!!!"

since they did that with electrabuzz. :(


Watch it happen in the next game, just because you said so.

_________________
All governments want you to be stupid so that you're easier to control.
{unown} {unown n} {unown} {unown r} {unown c} {unown h} {unown y}

Image


Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:33 am
Profile WWW
Lite Four
Lite Four
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:03 am
Posts: 3827
Location: Singapore
Post 
Maybe each Kangaskhan doesn't have a baby in its pouch. Maybe the two creatures are symbiotes :shock:

_________________
ImageImage


Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:21 am
Profile
Gym Leader
Gym Leader
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:59 pm
Posts: 1039
Location: Michigan
Post 
I agree with most.

I think there should be a pre-evolution and of course a higher evolution as well.

It is hard to really imagine what Kanga would look like if he/she evolved seeing as Kanga is already pretty big.

_________________
[b]I'm Back Jack
Crosman/Bambino 2013[/b]


Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:44 am
Profile ICQ
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:24 pm
Posts: 18
Location: The United States of America
Post 
they should do what they did with chansey - Pre-evolution and evolution.

Happiny caried an egg around right? so maybe the baby should carry like a doll around in the pouch it gets, and when it evolves, it finds some random baby thingy and puts it in its puch and nurses it until its bette/wants to leave, then the last form be like a normal/fighting type with like... baby kangas for armour {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan}


Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:40 pm
Profile WWW
Pokemon Ranger
Pokemon Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:41 pm
Posts: 728
Location: Atlanta, on a never ending quest to find wifi opponents...
Post 
Absol of Ire wrote:
type with like... baby kangas for armour {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan}



that is the weirdest thing i have ever heard. and while i agree with the sentiment that it makes no sense, i don't think there should be a pre-evolution. i am TIRED of baby PKMN!!!!

_________________
Think you can handle the Shady Park Gym?
1461*4103*1427
<center><img src="images/trainercards/kol40.png"></center>


Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 pm
Profile YIM
Dragon Tamer
Dragon Tamer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:55 pm
Posts: 149
Location: Middle-East
Post 
KOL40 wrote:
Absol of Ire wrote:
type with like... baby kangas for armour {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan} {kangaskhan}



hehehe you made my day...haha (still laphing)

Ya I agree with pre-evolution (the pink Kanga)

btw this is the last pokemon I remembered since I stoped playing pokemon couple of years back (yes im back to play pokemon :) ) , and I always wondered what is the ppokemon behined this wierd afghani name :lol:

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image Image - Diamond
Image Image Image Image Image Image - SoulSilver
Image Image Image Image Image Image - Platinum
Image Image Image Image Image Image - White
----------------------------------
Image Image Image Image Image Image - OTeam

My Trading Thread (Closed)


Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:23 am
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:42 pm
Posts: 253
Post 
In the old pkmn Animie wasn't there like baby Kangaskhan walking around?

There should be a baby. Even if it doesn't have a different name. (the full name doesn't let you add ' Jr.' to it right?

_________________
Image
Courtesy of James from http://hylianshield.net


Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:34 pm
Profile
Pokemon Ranger
Pokemon Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 521
Location: Cave of Origins, in the Depths of the Abyss
Post 
In my opinion, if any Pokemon really needs a pre-evolved form it is Kangashkan. It needed it in the beginning, and why is it only female? They should allow you to get a pre-evolved Kangashkan without all the extra Incense items they give you for breeding, and they could have a male Kangashkan, just without the pouch and baby. It is really weird that when you hatch a kanga egg you get a full grown Kangashkan and baby.

_________________
ImageImage
TRADE (Lv. 51 Palkia) Sig & TC by me


Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Profile
Pokemon Ranger
Pokemon Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:23 pm
Posts: 899
Post 
a baby kangaskhan would be cute. maybe called gengababy? hahaha.....

but it would still be really weird. i mean a grown kangaroo with a baby kangaroo in its pouch LAYS an egg. then the two kangaroos leave, and the egg hatches into a baby kangaroo which has nothing to do with the baby kangaroo which already exists. come on, i live in australia and i know a thing or two about kangaroos. lol!

anyway, since when was all this supposed to make sense? i think it would be cool for there to be a baby kangaskhan, but we shouldnt get too carried away with trying to think about it logically. because if we did that, then we would have to stop playing........

_________________
everything you will ever need to know is in my sig.


Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:33 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 19 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.