Psypoke
http://psypokes.com/forums/

Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?
http://psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=30178
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Haunted Water [ Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Which pokemon do you think deserve an evolution or two?

Author:  Dragonair101 [ Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

An evolution for pinsir would be interesting. He would probably look really awesome if he evolved.

On another note, I remember that I watched a video a long time ago on YouTube, it showed Houndoom evolving. I don't remember the name of it, but the evo looked amazing (it was called "Houndhell'). I wouldn't mind for a second if Gamefreak decided to adopt that one... if I find it, I'll make sure to edit this/post a link.

Author:  King_Charizard [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I think you should have the choice to evolve the legendaries. I just think it would be cool.

Author:  Mektar [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I think there was a similar thread a while back about this, and I said that {mawile} and {sableye} needed evos the most. They have terrible stats, but neat typings. Evolutions are what they both need to succeed.

Author:  Skeleton [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

The first thing that comes to my mind is Furret. I like Furret but it just doesn't really have ANYTHING going fer it. It's quick, but not strong enough to make good use of it... I think it might be interesting to give it an evolution that becomes a Normal/Dragon type... it's already only a stone's throw from a lesser dragon, if it just had some, well, draconic features.

The first thing that's SUPPOSED to come to mind is Farfetch'd. Obvious reasons. Obvious solutions.

Delibird is one of my favorite flying-types... but it's just so weak.

Gengar is great but I've always been a fan of Haunter's body type, with its disembodied hands. Though I don't have any ideas as to how a branch evolution would be utilized in terms of base stats.

Why in the heck does Surskit evolve from having one of the best types you could combine with Bug, to YET ANOTHER Bug/Flying-type? Whhhyyyyyy??? Branch evolution time!

Poor Spinda. Spinda could use a little attention.

When it was first shown I thought for sure Emolga was going to have an evolved form, but now, no.

Author:  Haunted Water [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I agree. Farfetch'd and Emolga deserve one. I laugh at people who say that Tauros should evolve into Bouffalant. GAME FREAK stated that Unova will be like a retread of Kanto, and it mainly was. Also, I think that Riolu needs a pre-evo. I dont know why.

Author:  Flaming_Wuzzle [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Skeleton wrote:
The first thing that comes to my mind is Furret. I like Furret but it just doesn't really have ANYTHING going fer it. It's quick, but not strong enough to make good use of it... I think it might be interesting to give it an evolution that becomes a Normal/Dragon type... it's already only a stone's throw from a lesser dragon, if it just had some, well, draconic features.


Image -------> Image

Makes total sense.

Author:  Skeleton [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I know.

Author:  EvilPenguin [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Samurott wrote:
Also, I think that Riolu needs a pre-evo. I dont know why.


Image

dumbass.

Author:  Haunted Water [ Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

EvilPenguin wrote:
Samurott wrote:
Also, I think that Riolu needs a pre-evo. I dont know why.


Image

dumbass.

Well at least I have chicken.

Author:  DNA [ Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

{dunsparce}

No further explanation is required.
Also there's Pinsir, but that goes without saying and someone said it already.

As for Pokemon I'd like there to be evolutions for? Claydol. But I doubt it.

Author:  Skeleton [ Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I dunno man. Flinch Dunsparce can be tough to hit if you play your cards right. Eviolite Flinch Dunsparce isn't anything I want to see.

Author:  Mektar [ Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I just got a better idea. Why not {corsola} ? It's totally terrible, and an evolution for it would make more sense than most of those stated above (LOL). It would look like Brain Coral (google it) and be Water/Phychic.

Author:  Edoc'sil [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I'm actually surprised {jynx} didn't get a third stage. I always considered Magby, Elekid, and Smoochum (Electabuzz, Magmar, Jynx) a trio. But, Magmar and Electabuzz evolved in to Electivire and Magmortar, but Jynx got left behind.

Author:  Skeleton [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Not really an evolution but I think an opportunity was missed on Kangaskhan in gen 4. Make the blue baby an actual usable pre-evolution, add a male Kangaskhan with no pouch as a gender difference. Why not?

Ledian is pretty bad.

Kricketune is pretty bad.

What if Nincada had a branch evolution that kept the Bug/Ground types and made it a big monster mole cricket? No, a mole cricket is not a cicada, but it would still work out.

It always seemed like Sableye ought to have one. Although Prankster isurely gives it an edge...

What if Castform had an evolution with permanent weather-based forms and Drizzle, Drought, or Snow Warning based on the form holy crap!

Pachirisu is pretty crap. Maybe if it evolved it would have a less animu name, too, mmmm

Chatot, totally

Author:  Haunted Water [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Actually Skeleton, Missing.no has a lot of mystery behind, as everyone knows. But, there is a thread somewhere on this site that explains Missing.no's existence, which ties in with Kanghaskan's.

Author:  Skeleton [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Missingno is not a mystery to anyone who has read about it. And I have. ▄█ 'M ▓▒ doesn't necessarily evolve into Kangaskhan because it was supposed to.

Author:  Haunted Water [ Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Yeah, I see your point!

Author:  CrazyRazey [ Sun May 27, 2012 7:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Farfetch'd, Jynx, a pre-evo of Kangaskhan, more eeveeloutions, a pre-evo that links Tauros with Miltank, Qwilfish, Dunsparce, Corsola, Sableye, Mawile, Spinda, Banette (Dusclops got one so why not?), Luvdisc, pre-evo of Tropius, Pachirisu, Chatot, pre-evo of Thorh and Sawk (much like the Hitmon's) and Emolga

Those are all the pokemon that deserve evolutions in my eyes

Author:  Electric Shake [ Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

mawile whis he so weak, i think the developer just forgot about the litte guy

Author:  GhostPony750 [ Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

There is alot of pokemon who deserve to evolve.
So what about Aerodactyl?
It would be nice to have a Rock/Dragon pokemon :P

Author:  BugMaster [ Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

what about {heracross}, an {eevee}lution that doesnt involve a stone/special circumstance, or maybe an evo for {dragonair} that doesnt get really heavy like {dragonite} it keeps the snake-like appearance

Author:  BENSLAYER [ Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I have always disliked the Feebas line so it would make me chortle to see a level-up evolution where it becomes even uglier, with the added annoyance of it only evolving after level 50 and having about as much difference in its stats as Blissey was to Chansey. It would be funny to see compulsive collectors drawn to raising it.

Yes, I am an evil kind of person. :lol: :twisted:

Author:  MTyndall95 [ Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

Image

He needs it, for God's sake.
In all honesty, though, I'd like for all non-legendaries without an evolved from to have at least one.

Author:  tripehound [ Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who Deserves an Evolution(s)?

I see the crying, but why does the Farfetch'd grow a tumor in the second image? :lol:

On topic: Any interest in a pre-evo for Lapras?

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/